Welcome to the blog of the European Consortium for Political Research Standing Group on Political Violence. In this blog you will find timely articles and commentary, research news, job opportunities and other information relevant to scholars with an interest in understanding political violence.
The Politics of Memory: Victimization, Violence and Contested Narratives of the Past.
Fifth Annual Conference of the Dialogues on Historical Justice and Memory Network
Columbia University, New York, 3-5 December 2015.
Paper Submission Deadline: 15 September 2015.
This conference aims to explore issues relating to memory, victimhood and violence. Possible themes include the changing nature and identity of victims and the theme of contested victimization, with a particular interest in topics that explore the anniversaries of historical violence and the way such events are remembered. Thus, for example, 2015 marks the 100th anniversary of the Armenian genocide; the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, the first Nuremberg trial and the Tokyo tribunal; the 50th anniversary of mass violence in Indonesia; the 20th anniversary of Srebrenica. Papers are invited that reflect on how these events are being remembered, on the evolution and politics of these memories.
Other themes include papers that examine ways in which the status of victimization provides a rationale for violence, or, conversely cases in which victimization leads to reconciliation. Papers that focus on a historiography of what constitutes victimization—from the shame of victimhood to victimization as empowering are also welcome. Also welcome is work on victims of political violence, and histories of contested victimization.
Finally, papers are invited that explore the theoretical and empirical relationship between memory (individual, societal or international) and historical dialogue, with a particular focus on the issue of the efficacy of justice, accountability and reconciliation mechanisms.
The Dialogues on Historical Justice and Memory Network is coordinated by an international Steering Committee and the Alliance for Historical Dialogue and Accountability (AHDA), at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights (ISHR).
Please e-mail a 300-500 word abstract and a 2-3 sentence bio as well as contact information to firstname.lastname@example.org no later than 15 September 2015. The abstract and bio should be sent as a single e-mail attachment. Applications for panels or roundtables are also welcome. For more information please see http://www.humanrightscolumbia.org/?q=ahda/conference
6th Annual Conference of the Oxford Institute for Ethics, Law and Armed Conflict: Legitimate Authority and Political Violence
28 – 29 August, 2015
Långholmen Hotel, Stockholm
“The Stockholm Centre is very pleased to be hosting the 6th Annual Conference of the Oxford Institute for Ethics, Law and Armed Conflict. This extremely successful conference series regularly brings together the very best scholars working on the ethics of war from philosophical, legal, political and practitioner backgrounds. *Please note that papers are pre-circulation only.* Sessions consist of a brief summary by the author, a thirty minute response and then an hour’s discussion. Papers will be available via the conference website from the 1st of August.”
The conference is free to attend and open to all. More information is available here
Understanding Conflict: Research, ideas and responses to security threats
Date: 08 – 11 June 2015
Venue: Chancellors’ Building, University of Bath, UK
The Understanding Conflict conference seeks to address important questions about conflict in the contemporary world and to interrogate the role of research and advocacy in understanding and responding to it. It also includes sessions on Understanding Terrorism and Political Violence, Legitimacy and Terrorism, State Terrorism, Radicalisation, Technology and Conflict and Responses to Conflict.
For further information and to register please see http://www.bath.ac.uk/ipr/events/news-0126.html
The ECPR is changing few things regarding standing groups. We’ve been asked from them to ask you to join our Standing Group via your MyECPR account. Please do so as soon as possible. It is important for our Standing Group on POLITICAL VIOLENCE and for you to receive more information in the future from us. More information below. Best
Lorenzo and Niall
Important changes to Standing Groups membership lists
The ECPR has recently made some improvements to the way its Standing Groups are presented on the website. These are designed primarily to provide more information in more user-friendly format to people who might be interested in joining a Standing Group or Research Network. These developments also enable people to join a Group or Network at the click of a button, again via the ECPR website. This is an important development as it means the ECPR will now hold all membership lists for its Standing Groups and Research Networks in its central database. We, as Standing Group Convenors, will then be able to access the lists as and when we need them in order to keep in touch with our membership.
Data Protections laws mean that it is not possible for us to pass our membership lists on to the ECPR; instead we are asking all members to join the Standing Group directly. In order to join you will need a MyECPR account, which we assume many of you will already have. If you do not have one, you can create an account in only a few minutes (and you need not be from an ECPR member institution to do so).
If you are from an ECPR member institution your membership to the SG is automatic. If you are from a non-member institution we will need to accept your application to join, so you membership status (which you can see via your MyECPR account, and on the SG pages when you are logged in to MyECPR) will be ‘pending’ until we accept you.
A second key change, is that membership to all Standing Groups is now annual, running calendar year. You will therefore be asked to renew your membership in January each year. This is the same process as joining, and only takes one click of a button.
Should you have any queries at all about this please do not hesitate to contact me or the ECPR at email@example.com.
Mixing and matching, blurring and emulating? Theories and methodologies to explore radical right politics beyond the electoral arena
ECPR general conference in Montreal from the 26th to the 29th of August for the section “Populist and Radical Politics : between Polarisation and Blurring”
Panel organizer: Caterina Froio, University of Paris 2- Assas firstname.lastname@example.org
Discussant: Pietro Castelli Gattinara, University of Leicester, email@example.com
Despite increasing scholarly attention to right-wing parties and their electoral fortunes, we still know little about extra-parliamentary groups of the radical right. Contemporary democracies are characterized by a great range of extreme-right organizations, differing not only in terms of their degree of institutionalization and internal structure, but also in terms of ideological framework, public discourse and strategies of action. As a matter of fact, extra-parliamentary radical right groups may be inspired by classic neonazi or neofascist ideologies, they often act in interplay with football and hooligan associations, and they sometimes are characterized by ‘blurred’ symbolic repertoires, mixing traditional references (Mussolini) with unusual ones (Che Guevara). Similarly, different types of extreme right organizations mobilize in multiple ways, ranging from traditional electoral campaigning to contentious and violent forms of protest, often taking inspiration from the experience set out by radical left social movements. Although many of these actors of the ‘groupuscular’ right are rarely successful in electoral terms, they often obtain visibility thanks to showcase protest events, a media-oriented public discourse, and the strategic use of violent repertoires.
The panel explores the discourse and practices of different radical right organizations. What are the issues that nonpartisan radical right organizations bring forward? To what extent do radical right organizations outside the electoral arena differ from their more institutionalized counterparts? What are the patterns of interaction between the two? To what extent have groupuscular right wing organizations been ‘contaminated’ by the symbolic and action repertoires of left-wing social movements and other political organizations?
We shall also explore the different forms of radical right mobilization. The radical right is much less of a united family than traditionally assumed in electoral studies and not all actors consider elections their primary arena for contention. How do nonpartisan radical right organizations mobilize? Do they follow conventional and non-conventional strategies? What explains the preference for specific repertories of action within and beyond institutional arenas? Do electoral opportunity structures matter for shaping mobilization strategies?
Finally, what strategies of action by the extreme right are (or have been) most successful? Previous research has investigated extensively the ‘contagion’ effect of extreme right and populist parties over their mainstream counterparts, most notably in terms of electoral agenda setting. What about their agenda setting impact beyond elections? What is the effect of different action repertoires by extreme right groups on media coverage and on the construction of public problems?
We will consider proposals dealing with radical right parties and social movements built on quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods approaches. Comparative contributions (across types of actors and/or countries) and case studies are welcome.
If you are interested please let Caterina Froio know as soon as possible. And if you are, please send your title, abstract (150 words max) and 3 to 8 Keywords to her by February 5th so that she can pull the complete panel proposal together by the due date of February 16th.
Complete details about panel and paper submissions can be found at: http://ecpr.eu/Events/EventDetails.aspx?EventID=94 .
The following recent publications may be of interest to the Group’s members:
Violent Capitalism and Hybrid Identity in the Eastern Congo: Power to the Margins.
By Timothy Raeymaekers, Cambridge University Press, December 2014
Contemporary Protest and the Legacy of Dissent.
Edited by Stuart Price and Ruth Sanz Sabido, Rowman and Littlefield, December 2014
Policing the Inner City in France, Britain and the US.
By Sophie Body-Gendrot and Catherine Wihtol de Wenden, Palgrave, December 2014
Civil Wars in South Asia: State, Sovereignty, Development.
Edited by Aparna Sundar and Nandini Sundar, Sage Publications, November 2014
Psychological Perspectives on Peacebuilding.
Edited by Brandon Hamber and Elizabeth Gallagher, Springer, November 2014
Denial of Violence: Ottoman Past, Turkish Present and Collective Violence against the Armenians.
By Fatma Muge Gocek, Oxford University Press, USA, November 2014
Call for Papers
ECPR General Conference, Standing Group on Political Violence
Université de Montréal, 26-29 August 2015
Political Violence: Identity and Ideology
The ECPR Standing Group on Political Violence is organizing a section entitled Political Violence: Identity and Ideology for the European Consortium for Political Research General Conference to be held at the Université de Montréal, 26-29 August 2015. Papers are now invited for submission via myECPR, the deadline is 16 February 2015.
Our principal aim is to bring together a multi-disciplinary group of scholars concerned with questions of political violence and its relationship to identity and ideology from both contemporary and historical perspectives. The section, comprised of four panels, will provide a forum for scholars to engage with a range of questions, including:
- How do ideological claims and identity commitments inform how violence is practised?
- Why do ideas that support violence become salient at particular moments in time and space, and how does this inform our understanding of cycles of contention?
- When do radical ideas facilitate mobilization, and how do they diffuse across contexts?
- How is the interaction between ideology and identity influenced by ideological leaders and to what effects?
- What impact do movement allies and adversaries play in shaping the ideological commitments and identity constructs implicated in political violence?
- In what ways do the identities and ideologies of violent opponents impact state responses?
- And how do ideological commitments constrain the scope of political violence?
We welcome papers that promise new insights from across the disciplines concerned with questions of political violence. Submissions can address conceptual and theoretical issues pertaining to ideology, identity, and violent politics; methodological approaches to understanding the complex interactions between these phenomena, including qualitative and quantitative perspectives; historical studies, and empirical and comparative analyses exploring the impact of ideological and identity commitments on how and why political violence emerges and declines. Papers may look at different forms of political violence, and the range of actors and contexts in which they are used, including social and protest movements, insurgencies, civil wars, terrorist campaigns, repressive regimes, and the behavior of armies, police forces and militias.
By providing a multi-disciplinary forum to explore these issues, we seek to further debates over the role of ideology and identity in violent politics and to facilitate the dissemination of research presented at the conference through publication of selected papers from the section.
Panel 1: When Civil Resistance Fails: Ideology, Identity and Repressive Regimes
Chair: Dr. William Thomson, School of International Relations, University of St Andrews
Panel 2: Ideology without Borders? Violent Discourses in the Age of the Internet
Chair: Dr. Aurélie Campana, Department of Political Science, Université Laval
Panel 3: Apocalyptic Worldviews, Terrorism and Political Violence
Chair: Dr. Frances Flannery, Director, Centre for the Interdisciplinary Study of Terrorism and Peace, James Madison University
Panel 4: The Role of Ideology in Violent Politics: Mobilisation, Strategy and Targeting
Chair: Dr. Sarah Marsden, Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence, University of St Andrews
More information about the panels can be found at: CSTPV news
Please contact the section conveners with any queries:
Section Chair: Dr. Sarah Marsden: firstname.lastname@example.org
Section Co-Chair: Dr. William Thomson: wwt @st-andrews.ac.uk